Mass per volume density.
Carats per Quart to Short tons per Cubic foot Converter — ct/qt to ton/ft3
Convert Carat per Quart (ct/qt) to Short ton per Cubic foot (ton/ft3) using the exact conversion factor (1 carat per quart = 0.0000065967 short ton per cubic foot). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Carats per Quart to Short tons per Cubic foot converter
Converter
Density Converter
Convert thousands of mass-per-volume density combinations for science, engineering, agriculture, and fluids.
Mass per volume density.
Result = input x 0.2113376419 / 32036.92675.
Density uses kilograms per cubic meter as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Carats per Quart to Short tons per Cubic foot
Carat per Quart and Short ton per Cubic foot both measure density — mass per unit volume — a property used to identify materials, check manufacturing quality, and predict whether something floats or sinks. As a fixed reference point, water has a density of exactly 1000 kg/m³ (1 g/cm³, 1 g/mL) at its temperature of maximum density, which is why many density figures in science and engineering are quoted relative to water. Both are mass per volume density units.
Formula
short tons per cubic foot = carats per quart × 0.00000659668898797
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 carat per quart equals 0.211337641887 base units, and 1 short ton per cubic foot equals 32036.9267479 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct carat per quart-to-short ton per cubic foot factor of 0.00000659668898797.
Simple example
1 ct/qt × 0.000006596688988 = 0.0000065967 ton/ft3
1 carat per quart = 0.0000065967 short tons per cubic foot.
Real-world example
1,000 ct/qt × 0.000006596688988 = 0.006596689 ton/ft3
1,000 carats per quart = 0.006596689 short tons per cubic foot.
Conversion table
| Carat per Quart (ct/qt) | Short ton per Cubic foot (ton/ft3) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ct/qt | 6.596689e-7 ton/ft3 |
| 1 ct/qt | 0.0000065967 ton/ft3 |
| 10 ct/qt | 0.0000659669 ton/ft3 |
| 100 ct/qt | 0.0006596689 ton/ft3 |
| 1,000 ct/qt | 0.006596689 ton/ft3 |
| 10,000 ct/qt | 0.0659668899 ton/ft3 |
Reverse conversion: Short ton per Cubic foot to Carat per Quart
0.0000065967 ton/ft3 × 151591.2 = 1.000001669 ct/qt
0.0000065967 short tons per cubic foot = 1.000001669 carats per quart.
carats per quart = short tons per cubic foot × 151591.200043
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Short ton per Cubic foot to Carat per Quart.
Understanding the Carat per Quart (ct/qt)
Mass per volume density.
Understanding the Short ton per Cubic foot (ton/ft3)
Mass per volume density.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many short tons per cubic foot are in 1 carat per quart?
1 carat per quart equals 0.0000065967 short tons per cubic foot, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert carat per quart to short ton per cubic foot?
Multiply the carat per quart value by 0.000006596688988. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert short ton per cubic foot back to carat per quart?
Use the reverse factor: 1 short ton per cubic foot equals 151,591.2 carats per quart. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a carat per quart?
Carat per Quart (ct/qt) is a unit of density.
What is a short ton per cubic foot?
Short ton per Cubic foot (ton/ft3) is a unit of density.
Is the carat per quart to short ton per cubic foot conversion exact?
Yes. Both carat per quart and short ton per cubic foot are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000006596688988 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between density and mass concentration?
Density is the mass of a pure substance or material per unit volume. Mass concentration is the mass of one component — like a dissolved solute — within a mixture's total volume. The two use the same kind of units but describe different physical situations.