Mass per volume density.
Carats per Quart to Slugs per Cubic Centimeter Converter — ct/qt to slug/cm3
Convert Carat per Quart (ct/qt) to Slug per Cubic Centimeter (slug/cm3) using the exact conversion factor (1 carat per quart = 1.448123e-8 slug per cubic centimeter). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Carats per Quart to Slugs per Cubic Centimeter converter
Converter
Density Converter
Convert thousands of mass-per-volume density combinations for science, engineering, agriculture, and fluids.
Mass per volume density.
Result = input x 0.2113376419 / 1.45939029e+7.
Density uses kilograms per cubic meter as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Carats per Quart to Slugs per Cubic Centimeter
Carat per Quart and Slug per Cubic Centimeter both measure density — mass per unit volume — a property used to identify materials, check manufacturing quality, and predict whether something floats or sinks. As a fixed reference point, water has a density of exactly 1000 kg/m³ (1 g/cm³, 1 g/mL) at its temperature of maximum density, which is why many density figures in science and engineering are quoted relative to water. Both are mass per volume density units.
Formula
slugs per cubic centimeter = carats per quart × 1.448123e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 carat per quart equals 0.211337641887 base units, and 1 slug per cubic centimeter equals 14593902.9372 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct carat per quart-to-slug per cubic centimeter factor of 1.448123e-8.
Simple example
1 ct/qt × 1.448123e-8 = 1.448123e-8 slug/cm3
1 carat per quart = 1.448123e-8 slugs per cubic centimeter.
Real-world example
1,000 ct/qt × 1.448123e-8 = 0.0000144812 slug/cm3
1,000 carats per quart = 0.0000144812 slugs per cubic centimeter.
Conversion table
| Carat per Quart (ct/qt) | Slug per Cubic Centimeter (slug/cm3) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ct/qt | 1.448123e-9 slug/cm3 |
| 1 ct/qt | 1.448123e-8 slug/cm3 |
| 10 ct/qt | 1.448123e-7 slug/cm3 |
| 100 ct/qt | 0.0000014481 slug/cm3 |
| 1,000 ct/qt | 0.0000144812 slug/cm3 |
| 10,000 ct/qt | 0.0001448123 slug/cm3 |
Reverse conversion: Slug per Cubic Centimeter to Carat per Quart
1.448123e-8 slug/cm3 × 69054915.19 = 1.00000011 ct/qt
1.448123e-8 slugs per cubic centimeter = 1.00000011 carats per quart.
carats per quart = slugs per cubic centimeter × 69054915.1913
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Slug per Cubic Centimeter to Carat per Quart.
Understanding the Carat per Quart (ct/qt)
Mass per volume density.
Understanding the Slug per Cubic Centimeter (slug/cm3)
Mass per volume density.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many slugs per cubic centimeter are in 1 carat per quart?
1 carat per quart equals 1.448123e-8 slugs per cubic centimeter, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert carat per quart to slug per cubic centimeter?
Multiply the carat per quart value by 1.448123e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert slug per cubic centimeter back to carat per quart?
Use the reverse factor: 1 slug per cubic centimeter equals 69,054,915.19 carats per quart. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a carat per quart?
Carat per Quart (ct/qt) is a unit of density.
What is a slug per cubic centimeter?
Slug per Cubic Centimeter (slug/cm3) is a unit of density.
Is the carat per quart to slug per cubic centimeter conversion exact?
Yes. Both carat per quart and slug per cubic centimeter are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.448123e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between density and mass concentration?
Density is the mass of a pure substance or material per unit volume. Mass concentration is the mass of one component — like a dissolved solute — within a mixture's total volume. The two use the same kind of units but describe different physical situations.