Mass per volume density.
Grams per Cubic Meter to Nanogram per Cubic inches Converter — g/m3 to ng/in3
Convert Gram per Cubic Meter (g/m3) to Nanogram per Cubic inch (ng/in3) using the exact conversion factor (1 gram per cubic meter = 16,387.064 nanogram per cubic inch). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Grams per Cubic Meter to Nanogram per Cubic inches converter
Converter
Density Converter
Convert thousands of mass-per-volume density combinations for science, engineering, agriculture, and fluids.
Mass per volume density.
Result = input x 0.001 / 6.10237441e-8.
Density uses kilograms per cubic meter as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Grams per Cubic Meter to Nanogram per Cubic inches
Gram per Cubic Meter and Nanogram per Cubic inch both measure density — mass per unit volume — a property used to identify materials, check manufacturing quality, and predict whether something floats or sinks. As a fixed reference point, water has a density of exactly 1000 kg/m³ (1 g/cm³, 1 g/mL) at its temperature of maximum density, which is why many density figures in science and engineering are quoted relative to water. Both are mass per volume density units.
Formula
nanogram per cubic inches = grams per cubic meter × 16387.064
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 gram per cubic meter equals 0.001 base units, and 1 nanogram per cubic inch equals 6.102374e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct gram per cubic meter-to-nanogram per cubic inch factor of 16387.064.
Simple example
1 g/m3 × 16387.064 = 16,387.064 ng/in3
1 gram per cubic meter = 16,387.064 nanogram per cubic inches.
Real-world example
1,000 g/m3 × 16387.064 = 16,387,064 ng/in3
1,000 grams per cubic meter = 16,387,064 nanogram per cubic inches.
Conversion table
| Gram per Cubic Meter (g/m3) | Nanogram per Cubic inch (ng/in3) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 g/m3 | 1,638.7064 ng/in3 |
| 1 g/m3 | 16,387.064 ng/in3 |
| 10 g/m3 | 163,870.64 ng/in3 |
| 100 g/m3 | 1,638,706.4 ng/in3 |
| 1,000 g/m3 | 16,387,064 ng/in3 |
| 10,000 g/m3 | 163,870,640 ng/in3 |
Reverse conversion: Nanogram per Cubic inch to Gram per Cubic Meter
1 ng/in3 × 0.00006102374409 = 0.0000610237 g/m3
1 nanogram per cubic inch = 0.0000610237 grams per cubic meter.
grams per cubic meter = nanogram per cubic inches × 0.0000610237440947
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Nanogram per Cubic inch to Gram per Cubic Meter.
Understanding the Gram per Cubic Meter (g/m3)
Mass per volume density.
Understanding the Nanogram per Cubic inch (ng/in3)
Mass per volume density.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many nanogram per cubic inches are in 1 gram per cubic meter?
1 gram per cubic meter equals 16,387.064 nanogram per cubic inches, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert gram per cubic meter to nanogram per cubic inch?
Multiply the gram per cubic meter value by 16387.064. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert nanogram per cubic inch back to gram per cubic meter?
Use the reverse factor: 1 nanogram per cubic inch equals 0.0000610237 grams per cubic meter. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a gram per cubic meter?
Gram per Cubic Meter (g/m3) is a unit of density.
What is a nanogram per cubic inch?
Nanogram per Cubic inch (ng/in3) is a unit of density.
Is the gram per cubic meter to nanogram per cubic inch conversion exact?
Yes. Both gram per cubic meter and nanogram per cubic inch are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 16387.064 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between density and mass concentration?
Density is the mass of a pure substance or material per unit volume. Mass concentration is the mass of one component — like a dissolved solute — within a mixture's total volume. The two use the same kind of units but describe different physical situations.