Mass per volume density.
Short tons per Gallon to Slugs per Gallon Converter — ton/gal to slug/gal
Convert Short ton per Gallon (ton/gal) to Slug per Gallon (slug/gal) using the exact conversion factor (1 short ton per gallon = 62.16190034 slug per gallon). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Short tons per Gallon to Slugs per Gallon converter
Converter
Density Converter
Convert thousands of mass-per-volume density combinations for science, engineering, agriculture, and fluids.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Mass per volume density.
Result = input x 239652.8546 / 3855.301291.
Density uses kilograms per cubic meter as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Short tons per Gallon to Slugs per Gallon
Short ton per Gallon and Slug per Gallon both measure density — mass per unit volume — a property used to identify materials, check manufacturing quality, and predict whether something floats or sinks. As a fixed reference point, water has a density of exactly 1000 kg/m³ (1 g/cm³, 1 g/mL) at its temperature of maximum density, which is why many density figures in science and engineering are quoted relative to water. Both are mass per volume density units.
Formula
slugs per gallon = short tons per gallon × 62.1619003432
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 short ton per gallon equals 239652.854634 base units, and 1 slug per gallon equals 3855.30129084 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct short ton per gallon-to-slug per gallon factor of 62.1619003432.
Simple example
1 ton/gal × 62.16190034 = 62.16190034 slug/gal
1 short ton per gallon = 62.16190034 slugs per gallon.
Real-world example
1,000 ton/gal × 62.16190034 = 62,161.90034 slug/gal
1,000 short tons per gallon = 62,161.90034 slugs per gallon.
Conversion table
| Short ton per Gallon (ton/gal) | Slug per Gallon (slug/gal) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 ton/gal | 6.216190034 slug/gal |
| 1 ton/gal | 62.16190034 slug/gal |
| 10 ton/gal | 621.6190034 slug/gal |
| 100 ton/gal | 6,216.190034 slug/gal |
| 1,000 ton/gal | 62,161.90034 slug/gal |
| 10,000 ton/gal | 621,619.0034 slug/gal |
Reverse conversion: Slug per Gallon to Short ton per Gallon
62.16190034 slug/gal × 0.01608702428 = 0.9999999999 ton/gal
62.16190034 slugs per gallon = 0.9999999999 short tons per gallon.
short tons per gallon = slugs per gallon × 0.0160870242782
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Slug per Gallon to Short ton per Gallon.
Understanding the Short ton per Gallon (ton/gal)
Mass per volume density.
Understanding the Slug per Gallon (slug/gal)
Mass per volume density.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many slugs per gallon are in 1 short ton per gallon?
1 short ton per gallon equals 62.16190034 slugs per gallon, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert short ton per gallon to slug per gallon?
Multiply the short ton per gallon value by 62.16190034. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert slug per gallon back to short ton per gallon?
Use the reverse factor: 1 slug per gallon equals 0.0160870243 short tons per gallon. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a short ton per gallon?
Short ton per Gallon (ton/gal) is a unit of density.
What is a slug per gallon?
Slug per Gallon (slug/gal) is a unit of density.
Is the short ton per gallon to slug per gallon conversion exact?
Yes. Both short ton per gallon and slug per gallon are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 62.16190034 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between density and mass concentration?
Density is the mass of a pure substance or material per unit volume. Mass concentration is the mass of one component — like a dissolved solute — within a mixture's total volume. The two use the same kind of units but describe different physical situations.