Mass per volume density.
Metric tons per Cubic foot to Megagrams per Cubic yard Converter — t/ft3 to Mg/yd3
Convert Metric ton per Cubic foot (t/ft3) to Megagram per Cubic yard (Mg/yd3) using the exact conversion factor (1 metric ton per cubic foot = 27 megagram per cubic yard). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Metric tons per Cubic foot to Megagrams per Cubic yard converter
Converter
Density Converter
Convert thousands of mass-per-volume density combinations for science, engineering, agriculture, and fluids.
Mass per volume density.
Result = input x 35314.66672 / 1307.950619.
Density uses kilograms per cubic meter as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Metric tons per Cubic foot to Megagrams per Cubic yard
Metric ton per Cubic foot and Megagram per Cubic yard both measure density — mass per unit volume — a property used to identify materials, check manufacturing quality, and predict whether something floats or sinks. As a fixed reference point, water has a density of exactly 1000 kg/m³ (1 g/cm³, 1 g/mL) at its temperature of maximum density, which is why many density figures in science and engineering are quoted relative to water. Both are mass per volume density units.
Formula
megagrams per cubic yard = metric tons per cubic foot × 27
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 metric ton per cubic foot equals 35314.6667215 base units, and 1 megagram per cubic yard equals 1307.95061931 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct metric ton per cubic foot-to-megagram per cubic yard factor of 27.
Simple example
1 t/ft3 × 27 = 27 Mg/yd3
1 metric ton per cubic foot = 27 megagrams per cubic yard.
Real-world example
1,000 t/ft3 × 27 = 27,000 Mg/yd3
1,000 metric tons per cubic foot = 27,000 megagrams per cubic yard.
Conversion table
| Metric ton per Cubic foot (t/ft3) | Megagram per Cubic yard (Mg/yd3) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 t/ft3 | 2.7 Mg/yd3 |
| 1 t/ft3 | 27 Mg/yd3 |
| 10 t/ft3 | 270 Mg/yd3 |
| 100 t/ft3 | 2,700 Mg/yd3 |
| 1,000 t/ft3 | 27,000 Mg/yd3 |
| 10,000 t/ft3 | 270,000 Mg/yd3 |
Reverse conversion: Megagram per Cubic yard to Metric ton per Cubic foot
27 Mg/yd3 × 0.03703703704 = 1 t/ft3
27 megagrams per cubic yard = 1 metric ton per cubic foot.
metric tons per cubic foot = megagrams per cubic yard × 0.037037037037
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Megagram per Cubic yard to Metric ton per Cubic foot.
Understanding the Metric ton per Cubic foot (t/ft3)
Mass per volume density.
Understanding the Megagram per Cubic yard (Mg/yd3)
Mass per volume density.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many megagrams per cubic yard are in 1 metric ton per cubic foot?
1 metric ton per cubic foot equals 27 megagrams per cubic yard, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert metric ton per cubic foot to megagram per cubic yard?
Multiply the metric ton per cubic foot value by 27. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert megagram per cubic yard back to metric ton per cubic foot?
Use the reverse factor: 1 megagram per cubic yard equals 0.037037037 metric tons per cubic foot. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a metric ton per cubic foot?
Metric ton per Cubic foot (t/ft3) is a unit of density.
What is a megagram per cubic yard?
Megagram per Cubic yard (Mg/yd3) is a unit of density.
Is the metric ton per cubic foot to megagram per cubic yard conversion exact?
Yes. Both metric ton per cubic foot and megagram per cubic yard are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 27 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between density and mass concentration?
Density is the mass of a pure substance or material per unit volume. Mass concentration is the mass of one component — like a dissolved solute — within a mixture's total volume. The two use the same kind of units but describe different physical situations.