Volumetric flow rate.
Oil barrel per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours Converter — bbl/wk to imp pt/h
Convert Oil barrel per Weeks (bbl/wk) to Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 oil barrel per weeks = 1.665348369 imperial pint per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Oil barrel per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.62875818e-7 / 1.57850347e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Oil barrel per Weeks to Imperial pint per Hours
Oil barrel per Weeks and Imperial pint per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial pint per hours = oil barrel per weeks × 1.66534836926
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 oil barrel per weeks equals 2.628758e-7 base units, and 1 imperial pint per hours equals 1.578503e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct oil barrel per weeks-to-imperial pint per hours factor of 1.66534836926.
Simple example
1 bbl/wk × 1.665348369 = 1.665348369 imp pt/h
1 oil barrel per weeks = 1.665348369 imperial pint per hours.
Real-world example
60 bbl/wk × 1.665348369 = 99.92090216 imp pt/h
60 oil barrel per weeks = 99.92090216 imperial pint per hours.
Conversion table
| Oil barrel per Weeks (bbl/wk) | Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bbl/wk | 0.1665348369 imp pt/h |
| 1 bbl/wk | 1.665348369 imp pt/h |
| 10 bbl/wk | 16.65348369 imp pt/h |
| 60 bbl/wk | 99.92090216 imp pt/h |
| 100 bbl/wk | 166.5348369 imp pt/h |
| 1,000 bbl/wk | 1,665.348369 imp pt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial pint per Hours to Oil barrel per Weeks
1.665348369 imp pt/h × 0.6004749628 = 0.9999999998 bbl/wk
1.665348369 imperial pint per hours = 0.9999999998 oil barrel per weeks.
oil barrel per weeks = imperial pint per hours × 0.600474962752
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial pint per Hours to Oil barrel per Weeks.
Understanding the Oil barrel per Weeks (bbl/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial pint per hours are in 1 oil barrel per weeks?
1 oil barrel per weeks equals 1.665348369 imperial pint per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert oil barrel per weeks to imperial pint per hours?
Multiply the oil barrel per weeks value by 1.665348369. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial pint per hours back to oil barrel per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial pint per hours equals 0.6004749628 oil barrel per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a oil barrel per weeks?
Oil barrel per Weeks (bbl/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial pint per hours?
Imperial pint per Hours (imp pt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the oil barrel per weeks to imperial pint per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both oil barrel per weeks and imperial pint per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.665348369 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.