Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Days to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — bu/d to cm3/ms
Convert Bushel per Days (bu/d) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per days = 0.0004078596 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Days to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.07859608e-7 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Days to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Bushel per Days and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = bushel per days × 0.000407859608413
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per days equals 4.078596e-7 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per days-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.000407859608413.
Simple example
1 bu/d × 0.0004078596084 = 0.0004078596 cm3/ms
1 bushel per days = 0.0004078596 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/d × 0.0004078596084 = 0.0244715765 cm3/ms
60 bushel per days = 0.0244715765 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Days (bu/d) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/d | 0.000040786 cm3/ms |
| 1 bu/d | 0.0004078596 cm3/ms |
| 10 bu/d | 0.0040785961 cm3/ms |
| 60 bu/d | 0.0244715765 cm3/ms |
| 100 bu/d | 0.0407859608 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 bu/d | 0.4078596084 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Bushel per Days
0.0004078596 cm3/ms × 2451.824058 = 0.9999999794 bu/d
0.0004078596 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 0.9999999794 bushel per days.
bushel per days = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 2451.82405753
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Bushel per Days.
Understanding the Bushel per Days (bu/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 bushel per days?
1 bushel per days equals 0.0004078596 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per days to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per days value by 0.0004078596084. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to bushel per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 2,451.824058 bushel per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per days?
Bushel per Days (bu/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per days to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per days and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0004078596084 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.