Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Days to Imperial quarts per Millisecond Converter — bu/d to imp qt/ms
Convert Bushel per Days (bu/d) to Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per days = 3.588663e-7 imperial quart per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Days to Imperial quarts per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 4.07859608e-7 / 1.1365225.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Days to Imperial quarts per Millisecond
Bushel per Days and Imperial quart per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quarts per millisecond = bushel per days × 3.588663e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per days equals 4.078596e-7 base units, and 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 1.1365225 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per days-to-imperial quart per millisecond factor of 3.588663e-7.
Simple example
1 bu/d × 3.588663e-7 = 3.588663e-7 imp qt/ms
1 bushel per days = 3.588663e-7 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/d × 3.588663e-7 = 0.000021532 imp qt/ms
60 bushel per days = 0.000021532 imperial quarts per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Days (bu/d) | Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/d | 3.588663e-8 imp qt/ms |
| 1 bu/d | 3.588663e-7 imp qt/ms |
| 10 bu/d | 0.0000035887 imp qt/ms |
| 60 bu/d | 0.000021532 imp qt/ms |
| 100 bu/d | 0.0000358866 imp qt/ms |
| 1,000 bu/d | 0.0003588663 imp qt/ms |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Millisecond to Bushel per Days
3.588663e-7 imp qt/ms × 2786553.207 = 1.000000039 bu/d
3.588663e-7 imperial quarts per millisecond = 1.000000039 bushel per days.
bushel per days = imperial quarts per millisecond × 2786553.20742
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Millisecond to Bushel per Days.
Understanding the Bushel per Days (bu/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quarts per millisecond are in 1 bushel per days?
1 bushel per days equals 3.588663e-7 imperial quarts per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per days to imperial quart per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per days value by 3.588663e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per millisecond back to bushel per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per millisecond equals 2,786,553.207 bushel per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per days?
Bushel per Days (bu/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per millisecond?
Imperial quart per Millisecond (imp qt/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per days to imperial quart per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per days and imperial quart per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.588663e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.