Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Decades to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — bu/decade to cL/ms
Convert Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per decades = 1.116682e-8 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Decades to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.11668168e-10 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Decades to Centiliters per Millisecond
Bushel per Decades and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = bushel per decades × 1.116682e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per decades equals 1.116682e-10 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per decades-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 1.116682e-8.
Simple example
1 bu/decade × 1.116682e-8 = 1.116682e-8 cL/ms
1 bushel per decades = 1.116682e-8 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/decade × 1.116682e-8 = 6.70009e-7 cL/ms
60 bushel per decades = 6.70009e-7 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/decade | 1.116682e-9 cL/ms |
| 1 bu/decade | 1.116682e-8 cL/ms |
| 10 bu/decade | 1.116682e-7 cL/ms |
| 60 bu/decade | 6.70009e-7 cL/ms |
| 100 bu/decade | 0.0000011167 cL/ms |
| 1,000 bu/decade | 0.0000111668 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Decades
1.116682e-8 cL/ms × 89551034.83 = 1.000000287 bu/decade
1.116682e-8 centiliters per millisecond = 1.000000287 bushel per decades.
bushel per decades = centiliters per millisecond × 89551034.8331
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Decades.
Understanding the Bushel per Decades (bu/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 bushel per decades?
1 bushel per decades equals 1.116682e-8 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per decades to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per decades value by 1.116682e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to bushel per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 89,551,034.83 bushel per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per decades?
Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per decades to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per decades and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.116682e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.