Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes Converter — bu/decade to cL/min
Convert Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) to Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per decades = 0.000670009 centiliter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.11668168e-10 / 1.66666667e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Decades to Centiliter per Minutes
Bushel per Decades and Centiliter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliter per minutes = bushel per decades × 0.000670009007845
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per decades equals 1.116682e-10 base units, and 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1.666667e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per decades-to-centiliter per minutes factor of 0.000670009007845.
Simple example
1 bu/decade × 0.0006700090078 = 0.000670009 cL/min
1 bushel per decades = 0.000670009 centiliter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 bu/decade × 0.0006700090078 = 0.0402005405 cL/min
60 bushel per decades = 0.0402005405 centiliter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) | Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/decade | 0.0000670009 cL/min |
| 1 bu/decade | 0.000670009 cL/min |
| 10 bu/decade | 0.0067000901 cL/min |
| 60 bu/decade | 0.0402005405 cL/min |
| 100 bu/decade | 0.0670009008 cL/min |
| 1,000 bu/decade | 0.6700090078 cL/min |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Minutes to Bushel per Decades
0.000670009 cL/min × 1492.517247 = 0.9999999883 bu/decade
0.000670009 centiliter per minutes = 0.9999999883 bushel per decades.
bushel per decades = centiliter per minutes × 1492.51724722
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Minutes to Bushel per Decades.
Understanding the Bushel per Decades (bu/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliter per minutes are in 1 bushel per decades?
1 bushel per decades equals 0.000670009 centiliter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per decades to centiliter per minutes?
Multiply the bushel per decades value by 0.0006700090078. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per minutes back to bushel per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per minutes equals 1,492.517247 bushel per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per decades?
Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per minutes?
Centiliter per Minutes (cL/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per decades to centiliter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per decades and centiliter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0006700090078 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.