Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/decade to cm3/s
Convert Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per decades = 0.0001116682 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.11668168e-10 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Decades to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Bushel per Decades and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = bushel per decades × 0.000111668167974
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per decades equals 1.116682e-10 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per decades-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 0.000111668167974.
Simple example
1 bu/decade × 0.000111668168 = 0.0001116682 cm3/s
1 bushel per decades = 0.0001116682 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/decade × 0.000111668168 = 0.0067000901 cm3/s
60 bushel per decades = 0.0067000901 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/decade | 0.0000111668 cm3/s |
| 1 bu/decade | 0.0001116682 cm3/s |
| 10 bu/decade | 0.0011166817 cm3/s |
| 60 bu/decade | 0.0067000901 cm3/s |
| 100 bu/decade | 0.0111668168 cm3/s |
| 1,000 bu/decade | 0.111668168 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Decades
0.0001116682 cm3/s × 8955.103483 = 1.000000287 bu/decade
0.0001116682 cubic centimeter per seconds = 1.000000287 bushel per decades.
bushel per decades = cubic centimeter per seconds × 8955.10348331
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Decades.
Understanding the Bushel per Decades (bu/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per decades?
1 bushel per decades equals 0.0001116682 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per decades value by 0.000111668168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to bushel per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 8,955.103483 bushel per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per decades?
Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per decades to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per decades and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000111668168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.