Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/decade to mm3/s
Convert Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per decades = 0.111668168 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.11668168e-10 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Decades to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Bushel per Decades and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = bushel per decades × 0.111668167974
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per decades equals 1.116682e-10 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per decades-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 0.111668167974.
Simple example
1 bu/decade × 0.111668168 = 0.111668168 mm3/s
1 bushel per decades = 0.111668168 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/decade × 0.111668168 = 6.700090078 mm3/s
60 bushel per decades = 6.700090078 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/decade | 0.0111668168 mm3/s |
| 1 bu/decade | 0.111668168 mm3/s |
| 10 bu/decade | 1.11668168 mm3/s |
| 60 bu/decade | 6.700090078 mm3/s |
| 100 bu/decade | 11.1668168 mm3/s |
| 1,000 bu/decade | 111.668168 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Decades
0.111668168 mm3/s × 8.955103483 = 1 bu/decade
0.111668168 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1 bushel per decades.
bushel per decades = cubic millimeter per seconds × 8.95510348331
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Decades.
Understanding the Bushel per Decades (bu/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per decades?
1 bushel per decades equals 0.111668168 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per decades value by 0.111668168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to bushel per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 8.955103483 bushel per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per decades?
Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per decades to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per decades and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.111668168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.