Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Decades to Metric teaspoon per Weeks Converter — bu/decade to metric tsp/wk
Convert Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) to Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per decades = 13.5073816 metric teaspoon per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Decades to Metric teaspoon per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.11668168e-10 / 8.26719577e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Decades to Metric teaspoon per Weeks
Bushel per Decades and Metric teaspoon per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per weeks = bushel per decades × 13.5073815982
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per decades equals 1.116682e-10 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 8.267196e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per decades-to-metric teaspoon per weeks factor of 13.5073815982.
Simple example
1 bu/decade × 13.5073816 = 13.5073816 metric tsp/wk
1 bushel per decades = 13.5073816 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Real-world example
60 bu/decade × 13.5073816 = 810.4428959 metric tsp/wk
60 bushel per decades = 810.4428959 metric teaspoon per weeks.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) | Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/decade | 1.35073816 metric tsp/wk |
| 1 bu/decade | 13.5073816 metric tsp/wk |
| 10 bu/decade | 135.073816 metric tsp/wk |
| 60 bu/decade | 810.4428959 metric tsp/wk |
| 100 bu/decade | 1,350.73816 metric tsp/wk |
| 1,000 bu/decade | 13,507.3816 metric tsp/wk |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Bushel per Decades
13.5073816 metric tsp/wk × 0.07403359361 = 1 bu/decade
13.5073816 metric teaspoon per weeks = 1 bushel per decades.
bushel per decades = metric teaspoon per weeks × 0.074033593612
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Weeks to Bushel per Decades.
Understanding the Bushel per Decades (bu/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per weeks are in 1 bushel per decades?
1 bushel per decades equals 13.5073816 metric teaspoon per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per decades to metric teaspoon per weeks?
Multiply the bushel per decades value by 13.5073816. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per weeks back to bushel per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per weeks equals 0.0740335936 bushel per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per decades?
Bushel per Decades (bu/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per weeks?
Metric teaspoon per Weeks (metric tsp/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per decades to metric teaspoon per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per decades and metric teaspoon per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 13.5073816 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.