Volumetric flow rate.
Bushels per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/fn to mm3/s
Convert Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per fortnight = 29.13282917 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushels per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.91328292e-8 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushels per Fortnight to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Bushel per Fortnight and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = bushels per fortnight × 29.1328291724
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per fortnight equals 2.913283e-8 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per fortnight-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 29.1328291724.
Simple example
1 bu/fn × 29.13282917 = 29.13282917 mm3/s
1 bushel per fortnight = 29.13282917 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/fn × 29.13282917 = 1,747.96975 mm3/s
60 bushels per fortnight = 1,747.96975 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/fn | 2.913282917 mm3/s |
| 1 bu/fn | 29.13282917 mm3/s |
| 10 bu/fn | 291.3282917 mm3/s |
| 60 bu/fn | 1,747.96975 mm3/s |
| 100 bu/fn | 2,913.282917 mm3/s |
| 1,000 bu/fn | 29,132.82917 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Fortnight
29.13282917 mm3/s × 0.03432553681 = 0.9999999999 bu/fn
29.13282917 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.9999999999 bushels per fortnight.
bushels per fortnight = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.0343255368054
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Fortnight.
Understanding the Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per fortnight?
1 bushel per fortnight equals 29.13282917 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per fortnight to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per fortnight value by 29.13282917. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to bushel per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.0343255368 bushels per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per fortnight?
Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per fortnight to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per fortnight and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 29.13282917 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.