Volumetric flow rate.
Bushels per Fortnight to Deciliters per Millisecond Converter — bu/fn to dL/ms
Convert Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) to Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per fortnight = 2.913283e-7 deciliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushels per Fortnight to Deciliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.91328292e-8 / 0.1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushels per Fortnight to Deciliters per Millisecond
Bushel per Fortnight and Deciliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
deciliters per millisecond = bushels per fortnight × 2.913283e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per fortnight equals 2.913283e-8 base units, and 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per fortnight-to-deciliter per millisecond factor of 2.913283e-7.
Simple example
1 bu/fn × 2.913283e-7 = 2.913283e-7 dL/ms
1 bushel per fortnight = 2.913283e-7 deciliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/fn × 2.913283e-7 = 0.0000174797 dL/ms
60 bushels per fortnight = 0.0000174797 deciliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) | Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/fn | 2.913283e-8 dL/ms |
| 1 bu/fn | 2.913283e-7 dL/ms |
| 10 bu/fn | 0.0000029133 dL/ms |
| 60 bu/fn | 0.0000174797 dL/ms |
| 100 bu/fn | 0.0000291328 dL/ms |
| 1,000 bu/fn | 0.0002913283 dL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Deciliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Fortnight
2.913283e-7 dL/ms × 3432553.681 = 1.000000028 bu/fn
2.913283e-7 deciliters per millisecond = 1.000000028 bushels per fortnight.
bushels per fortnight = deciliters per millisecond × 3432553.68054
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Deciliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Fortnight.
Understanding the Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many deciliters per millisecond are in 1 bushel per fortnight?
1 bushel per fortnight equals 2.913283e-7 deciliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per fortnight to deciliter per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per fortnight value by 2.913283e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert deciliter per millisecond back to bushel per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 deciliter per millisecond equals 3,432,553.681 bushels per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per fortnight?
Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a deciliter per millisecond?
Deciliter per Millisecond (dL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per fortnight to deciliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per fortnight and deciliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.913283e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.