Volumetric flow rate.
Bushels per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Hours Converter — bu/fn to metric tsp/h
Convert Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) to Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per fortnight = 20.975637 metric teaspoon per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushels per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 2.91328292e-8 / 1.38888889e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushels per Fortnight to Metric teaspoon per Hours
Bushel per Fortnight and Metric teaspoon per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per hours = bushels per fortnight × 20.9756370041
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per fortnight equals 2.913283e-8 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 1.388889e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per fortnight-to-metric teaspoon per hours factor of 20.9756370041.
Simple example
1 bu/fn × 20.975637 = 20.975637 metric tsp/h
1 bushel per fortnight = 20.975637 metric teaspoon per hours.
Real-world example
60 bu/fn × 20.975637 = 1,258.53822 metric tsp/h
60 bushels per fortnight = 1,258.53822 metric teaspoon per hours.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) | Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/fn | 2.0975637 metric tsp/h |
| 1 bu/fn | 20.975637 metric tsp/h |
| 10 bu/fn | 209.75637 metric tsp/h |
| 60 bu/fn | 1,258.53822 metric tsp/h |
| 100 bu/fn | 2,097.5637 metric tsp/h |
| 1,000 bu/fn | 20,975.637 metric tsp/h |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Hours to Bushel per Fortnight
20.975637 metric tsp/h × 0.04767435667 = 0.9999999998 bu/fn
20.975637 metric teaspoon per hours = 0.9999999998 bushels per fortnight.
bushels per fortnight = metric teaspoon per hours × 0.0476743566741
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Hours to Bushel per Fortnight.
Understanding the Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per hours are in 1 bushel per fortnight?
1 bushel per fortnight equals 20.975637 metric teaspoon per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per fortnight to metric teaspoon per hours?
Multiply the bushel per fortnight value by 20.975637. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per hours back to bushel per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per hours equals 0.0476743567 bushels per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per fortnight?
Bushel per Fortnight (bu/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per hours?
Metric teaspoon per Hours (metric tsp/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per fortnight to metric teaspoon per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per fortnight and metric teaspoon per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 20.975637 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.