Bushel per Hours to Cubic yard per Seconds Converter — bu/h to yd3/s

Convert Bushel per Hours (bu/h) to Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per hours = 0.000012803 cubic yard per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Bushel per Hours to Cubic yard per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 bushel per hours = 0.000012803 cubic yard per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 9.7886306e-6 / 0.764554858.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Bushel per Hours to Cubic yard per Seconds

Bushel per Hours and Cubic yard per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

cubic yard per seconds = bushel per hours × 0.000012803045458

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, and 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 0.764554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per hours-to-cubic yard per seconds factor of 0.000012803045458.

Simple example

1 bu/h × 0.00001280304546 = 0.000012803 yd3/s

1 bushel per hours = 0.000012803 cubic yard per seconds.

Real-world example

60 bu/h × 0.00001280304546 = 0.0007681827 yd3/s

60 bushel per hours = 0.0007681827 cubic yard per seconds.

Conversion table

Bushel per Hours (bu/h)Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s)
0.1 bu/h0.0000012803 yd3/s
1 bu/h0.000012803 yd3/s
10 bu/h0.0001280305 yd3/s
60 bu/h0.0007681827 yd3/s
100 bu/h0.0012803045 yd3/s
1,000 bu/h0.0128030455 yd3/s

Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Seconds to Bushel per Hours

0.000012803 yd3/s × 78106.41642 = 0.9999964494 bu/h

0.000012803 cubic yard per seconds = 0.9999964494 bushel per hours.

bushel per hours = cubic yard per seconds × 78106.416421

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Seconds to Bushel per Hours.

Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many cubic yard per seconds are in 1 bushel per hours?

1 bushel per hours equals 0.000012803 cubic yard per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert bushel per hours to cubic yard per seconds?

Multiply the bushel per hours value by 0.00001280304546. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert cubic yard per seconds back to bushel per hours?

Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per seconds equals 78,106.41642 bushel per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a bushel per hours?

Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a cubic yard per seconds?

Cubic yard per Seconds (yd3/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the bushel per hours to cubic yard per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both bushel per hours and cubic yard per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00001280304546 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.