Bushel per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — bu/h to mL/s

Convert Bushel per Hours (bu/h) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per hours = 9.788630602 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Bushel per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 bushel per hours = 9.788630602 milliliter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 9.7886306e-6 / 1e-6.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Bushel per Hours to Milliliter per Seconds

Bushel per Hours and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

milliliter per seconds = bushel per hours × 9.78863060191

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per hours equals 0.00000978863060191 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per hours-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 9.78863060191.

Simple example

1 bu/h × 9.788630602 = 9.788630602 mL/s

1 bushel per hours = 9.788630602 milliliter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 bu/h × 9.788630602 = 587.3178361 mL/s

60 bushel per hours = 587.3178361 milliliter per seconds.

Conversion table

Bushel per Hours (bu/h)Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
0.1 bu/h0.9788630602 mL/s
1 bu/h9.788630602 mL/s
10 bu/h97.88630602 mL/s
60 bu/h587.3178361 mL/s
100 bu/h978.8630602 mL/s
1,000 bu/h9,788.630602 mL/s

Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Bushel per Hours

9.788630602 mL/s × 0.1021593357 = 1 bu/h

9.788630602 milliliter per seconds = 1 bushel per hours.

bushel per hours = milliliter per seconds × 0.10215933573

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Bushel per Hours.

Understanding the Bushel per Hours (bu/h)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 bushel per hours?

1 bushel per hours equals 9.788630602 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert bushel per hours to milliliter per seconds?

Multiply the bushel per hours value by 9.788630602. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to bushel per hours?

Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.1021593357 bushel per hours. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a bushel per hours?

Bushel per Hours (bu/h) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a milliliter per seconds?

Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the bushel per hours to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both bushel per hours and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 9.788630602 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.