Volumetric flow rate.
Bushels per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/ms to cm3/s
Convert Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per millisecond = 35,239,070.17 cubic centimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushels per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 35.23907017 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushels per Millisecond to Cubic Centimeter per Seconds
Bushel per Millisecond and Cubic Centimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per seconds = bushels per millisecond × 35239070.1669
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per millisecond-to-cubic centimeter per seconds factor of 35239070.1669.
Simple example
1 bu/ms × 35239070.17 = 35,239,070.17 cm3/s
1 bushel per millisecond = 35,239,070.17 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/ms × 35239070.17 = 2,114,344,210 cm3/s
60 bushels per millisecond = 2,114,344,210 cubic centimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) | Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/ms | 3,523,907.017 cm3/s |
| 1 bu/ms | 35,239,070.17 cm3/s |
| 10 bu/ms | 352,390,701.7 cm3/s |
| 60 bu/ms | 2,114,344,210 cm3/s |
| 100 bu/ms | 3,523,907,017 cm3/s |
| 1,000 bu/ms | 35,239,070,170 cm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Millisecond
1 cm3/s × 2.837759e-8 = 2.837759e-8 bu/ms
1 cubic centimeter per seconds = 2.837759e-8 bushels per millisecond.
bushels per millisecond = cubic centimeter per seconds × 2.837759e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Millisecond.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per millisecond?
1 bushel per millisecond equals 35,239,070.17 cubic centimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond to cubic centimeter per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per millisecond value by 35239070.17. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per seconds back to bushel per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per seconds equals 2.837759e-8 bushels per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per seconds?
Cubic Centimeter per Seconds (cm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per millisecond to cubic centimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per millisecond and cubic centimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 35239070.17 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.