Volumetric flow rate.
Bushels per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond Converter — bu/ms to ft3/ms
Convert Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) to Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per millisecond = 1.244456019 cubic foot per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushels per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 35.23907017 / 28.31684659.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushels per Millisecond to Cubic feet per Millisecond
Bushel per Millisecond and Cubic foot per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic feet per millisecond = bushels per millisecond × 1.24445601852
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, and 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 28.316846592 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per millisecond-to-cubic foot per millisecond factor of 1.24445601852.
Simple example
1 bu/ms × 1.244456019 = 1.244456019 ft3/ms
1 bushel per millisecond = 1.244456019 cubic feet per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/ms × 1.244456019 = 74.66736111 ft3/ms
60 bushels per millisecond = 74.66736111 cubic feet per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) | Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/ms | 0.1244456019 ft3/ms |
| 1 bu/ms | 1.244456019 ft3/ms |
| 10 bu/ms | 12.44456019 ft3/ms |
| 60 bu/ms | 74.66736111 ft3/ms |
| 100 bu/ms | 124.4456019 ft3/ms |
| 1,000 bu/ms | 1,244.456019 ft3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic foot per Millisecond to Bushel per Millisecond
1.244456019 ft3/ms × 0.8035639549 = 1 bu/ms
1.244456019 cubic feet per millisecond = 1 bushels per millisecond.
bushels per millisecond = cubic feet per millisecond × 0.803563954948
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic foot per Millisecond to Bushel per Millisecond.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic feet per millisecond are in 1 bushel per millisecond?
1 bushel per millisecond equals 1.244456019 cubic feet per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per millisecond value by 1.244456019. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic foot per millisecond back to bushel per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic foot per millisecond equals 0.8035639549 bushels per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic foot per millisecond?
Cubic foot per Millisecond (ft3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per millisecond to cubic foot per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per millisecond and cubic foot per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.244456019 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.