Volumetric flow rate.
Bushels per Millisecond to Fluid ounces per Millisecond Converter — bu/ms to fl oz/ms
Convert Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) to Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per millisecond = 1,191.574719 fluid ounce per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushels per Millisecond to Fluid ounces per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 35.23907017 / 0.02957352956.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushels per Millisecond to Fluid ounces per Millisecond
Bushel per Millisecond and Fluid ounce per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounces per millisecond = bushels per millisecond × 1191.57471861
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per millisecond-to-fluid ounce per millisecond factor of 1191.57471861.
Simple example
1 bu/ms × 1191.574719 = 1,191.574719 fl oz/ms
1 bushel per millisecond = 1,191.574719 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/ms × 1191.574719 = 71,494.48312 fl oz/ms
60 bushels per millisecond = 71,494.48312 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) | Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/ms | 119.1574719 fl oz/ms |
| 1 bu/ms | 1,191.574719 fl oz/ms |
| 10 bu/ms | 11,915.74719 fl oz/ms |
| 60 bu/ms | 71,494.48312 fl oz/ms |
| 100 bu/ms | 119,157.4719 fl oz/ms |
| 1,000 bu/ms | 1,191,574.719 fl oz/ms |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Bushel per Millisecond
1 fl oz/ms × 0.0008392255931 = 0.0008392256 bu/ms
1 fluid ounce per millisecond = 0.0008392256 bushels per millisecond.
bushels per millisecond = fluid ounces per millisecond × 0.00083922559314
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Bushel per Millisecond.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounces per millisecond are in 1 bushel per millisecond?
1 bushel per millisecond equals 1,191.574719 fluid ounces per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per millisecond value by 1191.574719. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond back to bushel per millisecond?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0008392256 bushels per millisecond. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per millisecond to fluid ounce per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per millisecond and fluid ounce per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1191.574719 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.