Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Minutes to Centiliters per Millisecond Converter — bu/min to cL/ms
Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 0.0587317836 centiliter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Minutes to Centiliters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 0.01.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Centiliters per Millisecond
Bushel per Minutes and Centiliter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
centiliters per millisecond = bushel per minutes × 0.0587317836115
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 0.01 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-centiliter per millisecond factor of 0.0587317836115.
Simple example
1 bu/min × 0.05873178361 = 0.0587317836 cL/ms
1 bushel per minutes = 0.0587317836 centiliters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/min × 0.05873178361 = 3.523907017 cL/ms
60 bushel per minutes = 3.523907017 centiliters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) | Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/min | 0.0058731784 cL/ms |
| 1 bu/min | 0.0587317836 cL/ms |
| 10 bu/min | 0.5873178361 cL/ms |
| 60 bu/min | 3.523907017 cL/ms |
| 100 bu/min | 5.873178361 cL/ms |
| 1,000 bu/min | 58.73178361 cL/ms |
Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes
0.0587317836 cL/ms × 17.02655596 = 0.9999999998 bu/min
0.0587317836 centiliters per millisecond = 0.9999999998 bushel per minutes.
bushel per minutes = centiliters per millisecond × 17.026555955
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Millisecond to Bushel per Minutes.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many centiliters per millisecond are in 1 bushel per minutes?
1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0587317836 centiliters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per minutes to centiliter per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 0.05873178361. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert centiliter per millisecond back to bushel per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per millisecond equals 17.02655596 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a centiliter per millisecond?
Centiliter per Millisecond (cL/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per minutes to centiliter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per minutes and centiliter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.05873178361 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.