Bushel per Minutes to Centiliter per Seconds Converter — bu/min to cL/s

Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 58.73178361 centiliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Bushel per Minutes to Centiliter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 bushel per minutes = 58.73178361 centiliter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 1e-5.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Centiliter per Seconds

Bushel per Minutes and Centiliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

centiliter per seconds = bushel per minutes × 58.7317836115

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.00001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-centiliter per seconds factor of 58.7317836115.

Simple example

1 bu/min × 58.73178361 = 58.73178361 cL/s

1 bushel per minutes = 58.73178361 centiliter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 bu/min × 58.73178361 = 3,523.907017 cL/s

60 bushel per minutes = 3,523.907017 centiliter per seconds.

Conversion table

Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)
0.1 bu/min5.873178361 cL/s
1 bu/min58.73178361 cL/s
10 bu/min587.3178361 cL/s
60 bu/min3,523.907017 cL/s
100 bu/min5,873.178361 cL/s
1,000 bu/min58,731.78361 cL/s

Reverse conversion: Centiliter per Seconds to Bushel per Minutes

58.73178361 cL/s × 0.01702655596 = 1 bu/min

58.73178361 centiliter per seconds = 1 bushel per minutes.

bushel per minutes = centiliter per seconds × 0.017026555955

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Centiliter per Seconds to Bushel per Minutes.

Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many centiliter per seconds are in 1 bushel per minutes?

1 bushel per minutes equals 58.73178361 centiliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert bushel per minutes to centiliter per seconds?

Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 58.73178361. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert centiliter per seconds back to bushel per minutes?

Use the reverse factor: 1 centiliter per seconds equals 0.017026556 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a bushel per minutes?

Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a centiliter per seconds?

Centiliter per Seconds (cL/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the bushel per minutes to centiliter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both bushel per minutes and centiliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 58.73178361 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.