Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes Converter — bu/min to mm3/min
Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 35,239,070.17 cubic millimeter per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 1.66666667e-11.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Minutes
Bushel per Minutes and Cubic Millimeter per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per minutes = bushel per minutes × 35239070.1669
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 1.666667e-11 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-cubic millimeter per minutes factor of 35239070.1669.
Simple example
1 bu/min × 35239070.17 = 35,239,070.17 mm3/min
1 bushel per minutes = 35,239,070.17 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Real-world example
60 bu/min × 35239070.17 = 2,114,344,210 mm3/min
60 bushel per minutes = 2,114,344,210 cubic millimeter per minutes.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) | Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/min | 3,523,907.017 mm3/min |
| 1 bu/min | 35,239,070.17 mm3/min |
| 10 bu/min | 352,390,701.7 mm3/min |
| 60 bu/min | 2,114,344,210 mm3/min |
| 100 bu/min | 3,523,907,017 mm3/min |
| 1,000 bu/min | 35,239,070,170 mm3/min |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Minutes
1 mm3/min × 2.837759e-8 = 2.837759e-8 bu/min
1 cubic millimeter per minutes = 2.837759e-8 bushel per minutes.
bushel per minutes = cubic millimeter per minutes × 2.837759e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Minutes to Bushel per Minutes.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per minutes are in 1 bushel per minutes?
1 bushel per minutes equals 35,239,070.17 cubic millimeter per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per minutes to cubic millimeter per minutes?
Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 35239070.17. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per minutes back to bushel per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per minutes equals 2.837759e-8 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per minutes?
Cubic Millimeter per Minutes (mm3/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per minutes to cubic millimeter per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per minutes and cubic millimeter per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 35239070.17 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.