Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/min to mm3/s
Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 587,317.8361 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Bushel per Minutes and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = bushel per minutes × 587317.836115
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 587317.836115.
Simple example
1 bu/min × 587317.8361 = 587,317.8361 mm3/s
1 bushel per minutes = 587,317.8361 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/min × 587317.8361 = 35,239,070.17 mm3/s
60 bushel per minutes = 35,239,070.17 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/min | 58,731.78361 mm3/s |
| 1 bu/min | 587,317.8361 mm3/s |
| 10 bu/min | 5,873,178.361 mm3/s |
| 60 bu/min | 35,239,070.17 mm3/s |
| 100 bu/min | 58,731,783.61 mm3/s |
| 1,000 bu/min | 587,317,836.1 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Minutes
1 mm3/s × 0.000001702655596 = 0.0000017027 bu/min
1 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.0000017027 bushel per minutes.
bushel per minutes = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.0000017026555955
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Minutes.
Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per minutes?
1 bushel per minutes equals 587,317.8361 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per minutes to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 587317.8361. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to bushel per minutes?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.0000017027 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per minutes?
Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per minutes to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per minutes and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 587317.8361 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.