Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliter per Seconds Converter — bu/min to hL/s

Convert Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) to Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per minutes = 0.0058731784 hectoliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 bushel per minutes = 0.0058731784 hectoliter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 0.0005873178361 / 0.1.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Bushel per Minutes to Hectoliter per Seconds

Bushel per Minutes and Hectoliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

hectoliter per seconds = bushel per minutes × 0.00587317836115

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per minutes equals 0.000587317836115 base units, and 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per minutes-to-hectoliter per seconds factor of 0.00587317836115.

Simple example

1 bu/min × 0.005873178361 = 0.0058731784 hL/s

1 bushel per minutes = 0.0058731784 hectoliter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 bu/min × 0.005873178361 = 0.3523907017 hL/s

60 bushel per minutes = 0.3523907017 hectoliter per seconds.

Conversion table

Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)
0.1 bu/min0.0005873178 hL/s
1 bu/min0.0058731784 hL/s
10 bu/min0.0587317836 hL/s
60 bu/min0.3523907017 hL/s
100 bu/min0.5873178361 hL/s
1,000 bu/min5.873178361 hL/s

Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Seconds to Bushel per Minutes

0.0058731784 hL/s × 170.2655596 = 1.000000007 bu/min

0.0058731784 hectoliter per seconds = 1.000000007 bushel per minutes.

bushel per minutes = hectoliter per seconds × 170.26555955

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Seconds to Bushel per Minutes.

Understanding the Bushel per Minutes (bu/min)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many hectoliter per seconds are in 1 bushel per minutes?

1 bushel per minutes equals 0.0058731784 hectoliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert bushel per minutes to hectoliter per seconds?

Multiply the bushel per minutes value by 0.005873178361. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert hectoliter per seconds back to bushel per minutes?

Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 170.2655596 bushel per minutes. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a bushel per minutes?

Bushel per Minutes (bu/min) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a hectoliter per seconds?

Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the bushel per minutes to hectoliter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both bushel per minutes and hectoliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.005873178361 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.