Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours Converter — bu/s to cm3/h
Convert Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) to Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per seconds = 126,860,652.6 cubic centimeter per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.03523907017 / 2.77777778e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Seconds to Cubic Centimeter per Hours
Bushel per Seconds and Cubic Centimeter per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeter per hours = bushel per seconds × 126860652.601
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 2.777778e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per seconds-to-cubic centimeter per hours factor of 126860652.601.
Simple example
1 bu/s × 126860652.6 = 126,860,652.6 cm3/h
1 bushel per seconds = 126,860,652.6 cubic centimeter per hours.
Real-world example
60 bu/s × 126860652.6 = 7,611,639,156 cm3/h
60 bushel per seconds = 7,611,639,156 cubic centimeter per hours.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) | Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/s | 12,686,065.26 cm3/h |
| 1 bu/s | 126,860,652.6 cm3/h |
| 10 bu/s | 1,268,606,526 cm3/h |
| 60 bu/s | 7,611,639,156 cm3/h |
| 100 bu/s | 12,686,065,260 cm3/h |
| 1,000 bu/s | 126,860,652,600 cm3/h |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Bushel per Seconds
1 cm3/h × 7.882665e-9 = 7.882665e-9 bu/s
1 cubic centimeter per hours = 7.882665e-9 bushel per seconds.
bushel per seconds = cubic centimeter per hours × 7.882665e-9
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Hours to Bushel per Seconds.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeter per hours are in 1 bushel per seconds?
1 bushel per seconds equals 126,860,652.6 cubic centimeter per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per seconds to cubic centimeter per hours?
Multiply the bushel per seconds value by 126860652.6. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per hours back to bushel per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per hours equals 7.882665e-9 bushel per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per hours?
Cubic Centimeter per Hours (cm3/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per seconds to cubic centimeter per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per seconds and cubic centimeter per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 126860652.6 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.