Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks Converter — bu/s to mm3/wk
Convert Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per seconds = 2.131259e+13 cubic millimeter per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.03523907017 / 1.65343915e-15.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Seconds to Cubic Millimeter per Weeks
Bushel per Seconds and Cubic Millimeter per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per weeks = bushel per seconds × 2.131259e+13
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 1.653439e-15 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per seconds-to-cubic millimeter per weeks factor of 2.131259e+13.
Simple example
1 bu/s × 2.131259e+13 = 2.131259e+13 mm3/wk
1 bushel per seconds = 2.131259e+13 cubic millimeter per weeks.
Real-world example
60 bu/s × 2.131259e+13 = 1.278755e+15 mm3/wk
60 bushel per seconds = 1.278755e+15 cubic millimeter per weeks.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) | Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/s | 2.131259e+12 mm3/wk |
| 1 bu/s | 2.131259e+13 mm3/wk |
| 10 bu/s | 2.131259e+14 mm3/wk |
| 60 bu/s | 1.278755e+15 mm3/wk |
| 100 bu/s | 2.131259e+15 mm3/wk |
| 1,000 bu/s | 2.131259e+16 mm3/wk |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Bushel per Seconds
2.131259e+13 mm3/wk × 4.692062e-14 = 1.000000017 bu/s
2.131259e+13 cubic millimeter per weeks = 1.000000017 bushel per seconds.
bushel per seconds = cubic millimeter per weeks × 4.692062e-14
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Weeks to Bushel per Seconds.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per weeks are in 1 bushel per seconds?
1 bushel per seconds equals 2.131259e+13 cubic millimeter per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per seconds to cubic millimeter per weeks?
Multiply the bushel per seconds value by 2.131259e+13. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per weeks back to bushel per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per weeks equals 4.692062e-14 bushel per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per weeks?
Cubic Millimeter per Weeks (mm3/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per seconds to cubic millimeter per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per seconds and cubic millimeter per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.131259e+13 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.