Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quarts per Fortnight Converter — bu/s to imp qt/fn
Convert Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) to Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per seconds = 37,504,914.57 imperial quart per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quarts per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.03523907017 / 9.395854e-10.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quarts per Fortnight
Bushel per Seconds and Imperial quart per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quarts per fortnight = bushel per seconds × 37504914.5739
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, and 1 imperial quart per fortnight equals 9.395854e-10 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per seconds-to-imperial quart per fortnight factor of 37504914.5739.
Simple example
1 bu/s × 37504914.57 = 37,504,914.57 imp qt/fn
1 bushel per seconds = 37,504,914.57 imperial quarts per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 bu/s × 37504914.57 = 2,250,294,874 imp qt/fn
60 bushel per seconds = 2,250,294,874 imperial quarts per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) | Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/s | 3,750,491.457 imp qt/fn |
| 1 bu/s | 37,504,914.57 imp qt/fn |
| 10 bu/s | 375,049,145.7 imp qt/fn |
| 60 bu/s | 2,250,294,874 imp qt/fn |
| 100 bu/s | 3,750,491,457 imp qt/fn |
| 1,000 bu/s | 37,504,914,570 imp qt/fn |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Fortnight to Bushel per Seconds
1 imp qt/fn × 2.666317e-8 = 2.666317e-8 bu/s
1 imperial quart per fortnight = 2.666317e-8 bushel per seconds.
bushel per seconds = imperial quarts per fortnight × 2.666317e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Fortnight to Bushel per Seconds.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quarts per fortnight are in 1 bushel per seconds?
1 bushel per seconds equals 37,504,914.57 imperial quarts per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per seconds to imperial quart per fortnight?
Multiply the bushel per seconds value by 37504914.57. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per fortnight back to bushel per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per fortnight equals 2.666317e-8 bushel per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per fortnight?
Imperial quart per Fortnight (imp qt/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per seconds to imperial quart per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per seconds and imperial quart per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 37504914.57 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.