Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quart per Minutes Converter — bu/s to imp qt/min
Convert Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) to Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per seconds = 1,860.362826 imperial quart per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quart per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.03523907017 / 1.89420417e-5.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quart per Minutes
Bushel per Seconds and Imperial quart per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per minutes = bushel per seconds × 1860.36282609
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, and 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0000189420416667 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per seconds-to-imperial quart per minutes factor of 1860.36282609.
Simple example
1 bu/s × 1860.362826 = 1,860.362826 imp qt/min
1 bushel per seconds = 1,860.362826 imperial quart per minutes.
Real-world example
60 bu/s × 1860.362826 = 111,621.7696 imp qt/min
60 bushel per seconds = 111,621.7696 imperial quart per minutes.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) | Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/s | 186.0362826 imp qt/min |
| 1 bu/s | 1,860.362826 imp qt/min |
| 10 bu/s | 18,603.62826 imp qt/min |
| 60 bu/s | 111,621.7696 imp qt/min |
| 100 bu/s | 186,036.2826 imp qt/min |
| 1,000 bu/s | 1,860,362.826 imp qt/min |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Minutes to Bushel per Seconds
1 imp qt/min × 0.0005375295539 = 0.0005375296 bu/s
1 imperial quart per minutes = 0.0005375296 bushel per seconds.
bushel per seconds = imperial quart per minutes × 0.0005375295539
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Minutes to Bushel per Seconds.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per minutes are in 1 bushel per seconds?
1 bushel per seconds equals 1,860.362826 imperial quart per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per seconds to imperial quart per minutes?
Multiply the bushel per seconds value by 1860.362826. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per minutes back to bushel per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per minutes equals 0.0005375296 bushel per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per minutes?
Imperial quart per Minutes (imp qt/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per seconds to imperial quart per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per seconds and imperial quart per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1860.362826 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.