Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — bu/s to imp qt/wk
Convert Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per seconds = 18,752,457.29 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.03523907017 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Seconds to Imperial quart per Weeks
Bushel per Seconds and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = bushel per seconds × 18752457.287
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per seconds-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 18752457.287.
Simple example
1 bu/s × 18752457.29 = 18,752,457.29 imp qt/wk
1 bushel per seconds = 18,752,457.29 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 bu/s × 18752457.29 = 1,125,147,437 imp qt/wk
60 bushel per seconds = 1,125,147,437 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/s | 1,875,245.729 imp qt/wk |
| 1 bu/s | 18,752,457.29 imp qt/wk |
| 10 bu/s | 187,524,572.9 imp qt/wk |
| 60 bu/s | 1,125,147,437 imp qt/wk |
| 100 bu/s | 1,875,245,729 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 bu/s | 18,752,457,290 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Bushel per Seconds
1 imp qt/wk × 5.332634e-8 = 5.332634e-8 bu/s
1 imperial quart per weeks = 5.332634e-8 bushel per seconds.
bushel per seconds = imperial quart per weeks × 5.332634e-8
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Bushel per Seconds.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 bushel per seconds?
1 bushel per seconds equals 18,752,457.29 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per seconds to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the bushel per seconds value by 18752457.29. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to bushel per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 5.332634e-8 bushel per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per seconds to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per seconds and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 18752457.29 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.