Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Seconds to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight Converter — bu/s to metric tsp/fn
Convert Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) to Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per seconds = 8,525,035,855 metric teaspoon per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Seconds to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 0.03523907017 / 4.13359788e-12.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Seconds to Metric teaspoons per Fortnight
Bushel per Seconds and Metric teaspoon per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoons per fortnight = bushel per seconds × 8525035854.77
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per seconds equals 0.0352390701669 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 4.133598e-12 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per seconds-to-metric teaspoon per fortnight factor of 8525035854.77.
Simple example
1 bu/s × 8525035855 = 8,525,035,855 metric tsp/fn
1 bushel per seconds = 8,525,035,855 metric teaspoons per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 bu/s × 8525035855 = 511,502,151,300 metric tsp/fn
60 bushel per seconds = 511,502,151,300 metric teaspoons per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) | Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/s | 852,503,585.5 metric tsp/fn |
| 1 bu/s | 8,525,035,855 metric tsp/fn |
| 10 bu/s | 85,250,358,550 metric tsp/fn |
| 60 bu/s | 511,502,151,300 metric tsp/fn |
| 100 bu/s | 852,503,585,500 metric tsp/fn |
| 1,000 bu/s | 8.525036e+12 metric tsp/fn |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Fortnight to Bushel per Seconds
1 metric tsp/fn × 1.173016e-10 = 1.173016e-10 bu/s
1 metric teaspoon per fortnight = 1.173016e-10 bushel per seconds.
bushel per seconds = metric teaspoons per fortnight × 1.173016e-10
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Fortnight to Bushel per Seconds.
Understanding the Bushel per Seconds (bu/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoons per fortnight are in 1 bushel per seconds?
1 bushel per seconds equals 8,525,035,855 metric teaspoons per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per seconds to metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Multiply the bushel per seconds value by 8525035855. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per fortnight back to bushel per seconds?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per fortnight equals 1.173016e-10 bushel per seconds. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per seconds?
Bushel per Seconds (bu/s) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per fortnight?
Metric teaspoon per Fortnight (metric tsp/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per seconds to metric teaspoon per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per seconds and metric teaspoon per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8525035855 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.