Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/wk to mm3/s
Convert Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per weeks = 58.26565834 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5.82656583e-8 / 1e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Weeks to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds
Bushel per Weeks and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic millimeter per seconds = bushel per weeks × 58.2656583447
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per weeks-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 58.2656583447.
Simple example
1 bu/wk × 58.26565834 = 58.26565834 mm3/s
1 bushel per weeks = 58.26565834 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 bu/wk × 58.26565834 = 3,495.939501 mm3/s
60 bushel per weeks = 3,495.939501 cubic millimeter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) | Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/wk | 5.826565834 mm3/s |
| 1 bu/wk | 58.26565834 mm3/s |
| 10 bu/wk | 582.6565834 mm3/s |
| 60 bu/wk | 3,495.939501 mm3/s |
| 100 bu/wk | 5,826.565834 mm3/s |
| 1,000 bu/wk | 58,265.65834 mm3/s |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks
58.26565834 mm3/s × 0.0171627684 = 0.9999999999 bu/wk
58.26565834 cubic millimeter per seconds = 0.9999999999 bushel per weeks.
bushel per weeks = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.0171627684027
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Weeks.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per weeks?
1 bushel per weeks equals 58.26565834 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per weeks to cubic millimeter per seconds?
Multiply the bushel per weeks value by 58.26565834. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to bushel per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.0171627684 bushel per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?
Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per weeks to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per weeks and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 58.26565834 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.