Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Weeks to Fluid ounces per Millisecond Converter — bu/wk to fl oz/ms
Convert Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) to Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000019702 fluid ounce per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Weeks to Fluid ounces per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5.82656583e-8 / 0.02957352956.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Weeks to Fluid ounces per Millisecond
Bushel per Weeks and Fluid ounce per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounces per millisecond = bushel per weeks × 0.00000197019629401
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 0.0295735295625 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per weeks-to-fluid ounce per millisecond factor of 0.00000197019629401.
Simple example
1 bu/wk × 0.000001970196294 = 0.0000019702 fl oz/ms
1 bushel per weeks = 0.0000019702 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/wk × 0.000001970196294 = 0.0001182118 fl oz/ms
60 bushel per weeks = 0.0001182118 fluid ounces per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) | Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/wk | 1.970196e-7 fl oz/ms |
| 1 bu/wk | 0.0000019702 fl oz/ms |
| 10 bu/wk | 0.000019702 fl oz/ms |
| 60 bu/wk | 0.0001182118 fl oz/ms |
| 100 bu/wk | 0.0001970196 fl oz/ms |
| 1,000 bu/wk | 0.0019701963 fl oz/ms |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks
0.0000019702 fl oz/ms × 507563.6387 = 1.000001881 bu/wk
0.0000019702 fluid ounces per millisecond = 1.000001881 bushel per weeks.
bushel per weeks = fluid ounces per millisecond × 507563.638731
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Millisecond to Bushel per Weeks.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounces per millisecond are in 1 bushel per weeks?
1 bushel per weeks equals 0.0000019702 fluid ounces per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per weeks to fluid ounce per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per weeks value by 0.000001970196294. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per millisecond back to bushel per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per millisecond equals 507,563.6387 bushel per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per millisecond?
Fluid ounce per Millisecond (fl oz/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per weeks to fluid ounce per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per weeks and fluid ounce per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000001970196294 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.