Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Minutes Converter — bu/wk to metric tsp/min
Convert Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) to Metric teaspoon per Minutes (metric tsp/min) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per weeks = 0.6991879001 metric teaspoon per minutes). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Minutes converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 5.82656583e-8 / 8.33333333e-8.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Weeks to Metric teaspoon per Minutes
Bushel per Weeks and Metric teaspoon per Minutes both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per minutes = bushel per weeks × 0.699187900137
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per weeks equals 5.826566e-8 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per minutes equals 8.333333e-8 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per weeks-to-metric teaspoon per minutes factor of 0.699187900137.
Simple example
1 bu/wk × 0.6991879001 = 0.6991879001 metric tsp/min
1 bushel per weeks = 0.6991879001 metric teaspoon per minutes.
Real-world example
60 bu/wk × 0.6991879001 = 41.95127401 metric tsp/min
60 bushel per weeks = 41.95127401 metric teaspoon per minutes.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) | Metric teaspoon per Minutes (metric tsp/min) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/wk | 0.06991879 metric tsp/min |
| 1 bu/wk | 0.6991879001 metric tsp/min |
| 10 bu/wk | 6.991879001 metric tsp/min |
| 60 bu/wk | 41.95127401 metric tsp/min |
| 100 bu/wk | 69.91879001 metric tsp/min |
| 1,000 bu/wk | 699.1879001 metric tsp/min |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Minutes to Bushel per Weeks
0.6991879001 metric tsp/min × 1.4302307 = 0.9999999999 bu/wk
0.6991879001 metric teaspoon per minutes = 0.9999999999 bushel per weeks.
bushel per weeks = metric teaspoon per minutes × 1.43023070022
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Minutes to Bushel per Weeks.
Understanding the Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Minutes (metric tsp/min)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per minutes are in 1 bushel per weeks?
1 bushel per weeks equals 0.6991879001 metric teaspoon per minutes, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per weeks to metric teaspoon per minutes?
Multiply the bushel per weeks value by 0.6991879001. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per minutes back to bushel per weeks?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per minutes equals 1.4302307 bushel per weeks. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per weeks?
Bushel per Weeks (bu/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per minutes?
Metric teaspoon per Minutes (metric tsp/min) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per weeks to metric teaspoon per minutes conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per weeks and metric teaspoon per minutes are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.6991879001 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.