Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Years to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond Converter — bu/yr to cm3/ms
Convert Bushel per Years (bu/yr) to Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per years = 0.0000011167 cubic centimeter per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Years to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.11668168e-9 / 0.001.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Years to Cubic Centimeters per Millisecond
Bushel per Years and Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic centimeters per millisecond = bushel per years × 0.00000111668167974
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per years equals 1.116682e-9 base units, and 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 0.001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per years-to-cubic centimeter per millisecond factor of 0.00000111668167974.
Simple example
1 bu/yr × 0.00000111668168 = 0.0000011167 cm3/ms
1 bushel per years = 0.0000011167 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/yr × 0.00000111668168 = 0.0000670009 cm3/ms
60 bushel per years = 0.0000670009 cubic centimeters per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Years (bu/yr) | Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/yr | 1.116682e-7 cm3/ms |
| 1 bu/yr | 0.0000011167 cm3/ms |
| 10 bu/yr | 0.0000111668 cm3/ms |
| 60 bu/yr | 0.0000670009 cm3/ms |
| 100 bu/yr | 0.0001116682 cm3/ms |
| 1,000 bu/yr | 0.0011166817 cm3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Bushel per Years
0.0000011167 cm3/ms × 895510.3483 = 1.000016406 bu/yr
0.0000011167 cubic centimeters per millisecond = 1.000016406 bushel per years.
bushel per years = cubic centimeters per millisecond × 895510.348331
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond to Bushel per Years.
Understanding the Bushel per Years (bu/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic centimeters per millisecond are in 1 bushel per years?
1 bushel per years equals 0.0000011167 cubic centimeters per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per years to cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per years value by 0.00000111668168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic centimeter per millisecond back to bushel per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic centimeter per millisecond equals 895,510.3483 bushel per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per years?
Bushel per Years (bu/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic centimeter per millisecond?
Cubic Centimeter per Millisecond (cm3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per years to cubic centimeter per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per years and cubic centimeter per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.00000111668168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.