Bushel per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds Converter — bu/yr to mm3/s

Convert Bushel per Years (bu/yr) to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per years = 1.11668168 cubic millimeter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Bushel per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 bushel per years = 1.11668168 cubic millimeter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.11668168e-9 / 1e-9.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Bushel per Years to Cubic Millimeter per Seconds

Bushel per Years and Cubic Millimeter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

cubic millimeter per seconds = bushel per years × 1.11668167974

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per years equals 1.116682e-9 base units, and 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per years-to-cubic millimeter per seconds factor of 1.11668167974.

Simple example

1 bu/yr × 1.11668168 = 1.11668168 mm3/s

1 bushel per years = 1.11668168 cubic millimeter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 bu/yr × 1.11668168 = 67.00090078 mm3/s

60 bushel per years = 67.00090078 cubic millimeter per seconds.

Conversion table

Bushel per Years (bu/yr)Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)
0.1 bu/yr0.111668168 mm3/s
1 bu/yr1.11668168 mm3/s
10 bu/yr11.1668168 mm3/s
60 bu/yr67.00090078 mm3/s
100 bu/yr111.668168 mm3/s
1,000 bu/yr1,116.68168 mm3/s

Reverse conversion: Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Years

1.11668168 mm3/s × 0.8955103483 = 1 bu/yr

1.11668168 cubic millimeter per seconds = 1 bushel per years.

bushel per years = cubic millimeter per seconds × 0.895510348331

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic Millimeter per Seconds to Bushel per Years.

Understanding the Bushel per Years (bu/yr)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many cubic millimeter per seconds are in 1 bushel per years?

1 bushel per years equals 1.11668168 cubic millimeter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert bushel per years to cubic millimeter per seconds?

Multiply the bushel per years value by 1.11668168. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert cubic millimeter per seconds back to bushel per years?

Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic millimeter per seconds equals 0.8955103483 bushel per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a bushel per years?

Bushel per Years (bu/yr) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a cubic millimeter per seconds?

Cubic Millimeter per Seconds (mm3/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the bushel per years to cubic millimeter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both bushel per years and cubic millimeter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.11668168 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.