Volumetric flow rate.
Bushel per Years to Cubic yards per Millisecond Converter — bu/yr to yd3/ms
Convert Bushel per Years (bu/yr) to Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 bushel per years = 1.460564e-12 cubic yard per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Bushel per Years to Cubic yards per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.11668168e-9 / 764.554858.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Bushel per Years to Cubic yards per Millisecond
Bushel per Years and Cubic yard per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
cubic yards per millisecond = bushel per years × 1.460564e-12
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 bushel per years equals 1.116682e-9 base units, and 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 764.554857984 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct bushel per years-to-cubic yard per millisecond factor of 1.460564e-12.
Simple example
1 bu/yr × 1.460564e-12 = 1.460564e-12 yd3/ms
1 bushel per years = 1.460564e-12 cubic yards per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 bu/yr × 1.460564e-12 = 8.763387e-11 yd3/ms
60 bushel per years = 8.763387e-11 cubic yards per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Bushel per Years (bu/yr) | Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 bu/yr | 1.460564e-13 yd3/ms |
| 1 bu/yr | 1.460564e-12 yd3/ms |
| 10 bu/yr | 1.460564e-11 yd3/ms |
| 60 bu/yr | 8.763387e-11 yd3/ms |
| 100 bu/yr | 1.460564e-10 yd3/ms |
| 1,000 bu/yr | 1.460564e-9 yd3/ms |
Reverse conversion: Cubic yard per Millisecond to Bushel per Years
1.460564e-12 yd3/ms × 684666787200 = 0.9999996614 bu/yr
1.460564e-12 cubic yards per millisecond = 0.9999996614 bushel per years.
bushel per years = cubic yards per millisecond × 684666787191
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Cubic yard per Millisecond to Bushel per Years.
Understanding the Bushel per Years (bu/yr)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many cubic yards per millisecond are in 1 bushel per years?
1 bushel per years equals 1.460564e-12 cubic yards per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert bushel per years to cubic yard per millisecond?
Multiply the bushel per years value by 1.460564e-12. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert cubic yard per millisecond back to bushel per years?
Use the reverse factor: 1 cubic yard per millisecond equals 684,666,787,200 bushel per years. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a bushel per years?
Bushel per Years (bu/yr) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a cubic yard per millisecond?
Cubic yard per Millisecond (yd3/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the bushel per years to cubic yard per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both bushel per years and cubic yard per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.460564e-12 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.