Centiliter per Days to Microliter per Seconds Converter — cL/d to uL/s

Convert Centiliter per Days (cL/d) to Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per days = 0.1157407407 microliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.

Centiliter per Days to Microliter per Seconds converter

Converter

Flow Rate Converter

Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.

Result 1 centiliter per days = 0.1157407407 microliter per seconds
Advertisement Converter ad slot

Reserved below the result so the calculator remains usable.

From definition

Volumetric flow rate.

To definition

Volumetric flow rate.

Formula

Result = input x 1.15740741e-10 / 1e-9.

Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.

Advertisement Ad slot: content top (728x90)

Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.

About Converting Centiliter per Days to Microliter per Seconds

Centiliter per Days and Microliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.

Formula

microliter per seconds = centiliter per days × 0.115740740741

This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per days equals 1.157407e-10 base units, and 1 microliter per seconds equals 1e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per days-to-microliter per seconds factor of 0.115740740741.

Simple example

1 cL/d × 0.1157407407 = 0.1157407407 uL/s

1 centiliter per days = 0.1157407407 microliter per seconds.

Real-world example

60 cL/d × 0.1157407407 = 6.944444444 uL/s

60 centiliter per days = 6.944444444 microliter per seconds.

Conversion table

Centiliter per Days (cL/d)Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)
0.1 cL/d0.0115740741 uL/s
1 cL/d0.1157407407 uL/s
10 cL/d1.157407407 uL/s
60 cL/d6.944444444 uL/s
100 cL/d11.57407407 uL/s
1,000 cL/d115.7407407 uL/s

Reverse conversion: Microliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Days

0.1157407407 uL/s × 8.64 = 0.9999999996 cL/d

0.1157407407 microliter per seconds = 0.9999999996 centiliter per days.

centiliter per days = microliter per seconds × 8.64

For a page dedicated to this direction, see Microliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Days.

Understanding the Centiliter per Days (cL/d)

Volumetric flow rate.

Understanding the Microliter per Seconds (uL/s)

Volumetric flow rate.

Advertisement Ad slot: content middle (728x90)

Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.

Frequently asked questions

How many microliter per seconds are in 1 centiliter per days?

1 centiliter per days equals 0.1157407407 microliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.

How do I convert centiliter per days to microliter per seconds?

Multiply the centiliter per days value by 0.1157407407. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.

How do I convert microliter per seconds back to centiliter per days?

Use the reverse factor: 1 microliter per seconds equals 8.64 centiliter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.

What is a centiliter per days?

Centiliter per Days (cL/d) is a unit of flow rate.

What is a microliter per seconds?

Microliter per Seconds (uL/s) is a unit of flow rate.

Is the centiliter per days to microliter per seconds conversion exact?

Yes. Both centiliter per days and microliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.1157407407 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.

What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?

Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.