Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks Converter — cL/d to imp qt/wk
Convert Centiliter per Days (cL/d) to Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per days = 0.0615913895 imperial quart per weeks). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 1.15740741e-10 / 1.8791708e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Days to Imperial quart per Weeks
Centiliter per Days and Imperial quart per Weeks both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per weeks = centiliter per days × 0.0615913895237
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per days equals 1.157407e-10 base units, and 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 1.879171e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per days-to-imperial quart per weeks factor of 0.0615913895237.
Simple example
1 cL/d × 0.06159138952 = 0.0615913895 imp qt/wk
1 centiliter per days = 0.0615913895 imperial quart per weeks.
Real-world example
60 cL/d × 0.06159138952 = 3.695483371 imp qt/wk
60 centiliter per days = 3.695483371 imperial quart per weeks.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Days (cL/d) | Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/d | 0.006159139 imp qt/wk |
| 1 cL/d | 0.0615913895 imp qt/wk |
| 10 cL/d | 0.6159138952 imp qt/wk |
| 60 cL/d | 3.695483371 imp qt/wk |
| 100 cL/d | 6.159138952 imp qt/wk |
| 1,000 cL/d | 61.59138952 imp qt/wk |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Days
0.0615913895 imp qt/wk × 16.23603571 = 0.9999999996 cL/d
0.0615913895 imperial quart per weeks = 0.9999999996 centiliter per days.
centiliter per days = imperial quart per weeks × 16.2360357143
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Weeks to Centiliter per Days.
Understanding the Centiliter per Days (cL/d)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per weeks are in 1 centiliter per days?
1 centiliter per days equals 0.0615913895 imperial quart per weeks, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per days to imperial quart per weeks?
Multiply the centiliter per days value by 0.06159138952. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per weeks back to centiliter per days?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per weeks equals 16.23603571 centiliter per days. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per days?
Centiliter per Days (cL/d) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per weeks?
Imperial quart per Weeks (imp qt/wk) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per days to imperial quart per weeks conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per days and imperial quart per weeks are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.06159138952 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.