Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Decades to Fluid ounce per Hours Converter — cL/decade to fl oz/h
Convert Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) to Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per decades = 0.0000038575 fluid ounce per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Decades to Fluid ounce per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 8.21486932e-9.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Decades to Fluid ounce per Hours
Centiliter per Decades and Fluid ounce per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
fluid ounce per hours = centiliter per decades × 0.00000385748540374
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per decades equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 fluid ounce per hours equals 8.214869e-9 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per decades-to-fluid ounce per hours factor of 0.00000385748540374.
Simple example
1 cL/decade × 0.000003857485404 = 0.0000038575 fl oz/h
1 centiliter per decades = 0.0000038575 fluid ounce per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/decade × 0.000003857485404 = 0.0002314491 fl oz/h
60 centiliter per decades = 0.0002314491 fluid ounce per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) | Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/decade | 3.857485e-7 fl oz/h |
| 1 cL/decade | 0.0000038575 fl oz/h |
| 10 cL/decade | 0.0000385749 fl oz/h |
| 60 cL/decade | 0.0002314491 fl oz/h |
| 100 cL/decade | 0.0003857485 fl oz/h |
| 1,000 cL/decade | 0.0038574854 fl oz/h |
Reverse conversion: Fluid ounce per Hours to Centiliter per Decades
0.0000038575 fl oz/h × 259236.2369 = 1.000003784 cL/decade
0.0000038575 fluid ounce per hours = 1.000003784 centiliter per decades.
centiliter per decades = fluid ounce per hours × 259236.23691
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Fluid ounce per Hours to Centiliter per Decades.
Understanding the Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many fluid ounce per hours are in 1 centiliter per decades?
1 centiliter per decades equals 0.0000038575 fluid ounce per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per decades to fluid ounce per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per decades value by 0.000003857485404. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert fluid ounce per hours back to centiliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 fluid ounce per hours equals 259,236.2369 centiliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per decades?
Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a fluid ounce per hours?
Fluid ounce per Hours (fl oz/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per decades to fluid ounce per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per decades and fluid ounce per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000003857485404 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.