Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Decades to Gallon per Seconds Converter — cL/decade to gal/s
Convert Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) to Gallon per Seconds (gal/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per decades = 8.371279e-12 gallon per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Decades to Gallon per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 0.003785411784.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Decades to Gallon per Seconds
Centiliter per Decades and Gallon per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
gallon per seconds = centiliter per decades × 8.371279e-12
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per decades equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 gallon per seconds equals 0.003785411784 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per decades-to-gallon per seconds factor of 8.371279e-12.
Simple example
1 cL/decade × 8.371279e-12 = 8.371279e-12 gal/s
1 centiliter per decades = 8.371279e-12 gallon per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/decade × 8.371279e-12 = 5.022767e-10 gal/s
60 centiliter per decades = 5.022767e-10 gallon per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) | Gallon per Seconds (gal/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/decade | 8.371279e-13 gal/s |
| 1 cL/decade | 8.371279e-12 gal/s |
| 10 cL/decade | 8.371279e-11 gal/s |
| 60 cL/decade | 5.022767e-10 gal/s |
| 100 cL/decade | 8.371279e-10 gal/s |
| 1,000 cL/decade | 8.371279e-9 gal/s |
Reverse conversion: Gallon per Seconds to Centiliter per Decades
8.371279e-12 gal/s × 119456058000 = 0.9999999895 cL/decade
8.371279e-12 gallon per seconds = 0.9999999895 centiliter per decades.
centiliter per decades = gallon per seconds × 119456057968
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Gallon per Seconds to Centiliter per Decades.
Understanding the Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Gallon per Seconds (gal/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many gallon per seconds are in 1 centiliter per decades?
1 centiliter per decades equals 8.371279e-12 gallon per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per decades to gallon per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per decades value by 8.371279e-12. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert gallon per seconds back to centiliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 gallon per seconds equals 119,456,058,000 centiliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per decades?
Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a gallon per seconds?
Gallon per Seconds (gal/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per decades to gallon per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per decades and gallon per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.371279e-12 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.