Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Decades to Milliliters per Fortnight Converter — cL/decade to mL/fn
Convert Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) to Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per decades = 0.0383306981 milliliter per fortnight). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Decades to Milliliters per Fortnight converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 8.26719577e-13.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Decades to Milliliters per Fortnight
Centiliter per Decades and Milliliter per Fortnight both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliters per fortnight = centiliter per decades × 0.0383306980978
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per decades equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-13 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per decades-to-milliliter per fortnight factor of 0.0383306980978.
Simple example
1 cL/decade × 0.0383306981 = 0.0383306981 mL/fn
1 centiliter per decades = 0.0383306981 milliliters per fortnight.
Real-world example
60 cL/decade × 0.0383306981 = 2.299841886 mL/fn
60 centiliter per decades = 2.299841886 milliliters per fortnight.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) | Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/decade | 0.0038330698 mL/fn |
| 1 cL/decade | 0.0383306981 mL/fn |
| 10 cL/decade | 0.383306981 mL/fn |
| 60 cL/decade | 2.299841886 mL/fn |
| 100 cL/decade | 3.83306981 mL/fn |
| 1,000 cL/decade | 38.3306981 mL/fn |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Fortnight to Centiliter per Decades
0.0383306981 mL/fn × 26.08875 = 1 cL/decade
0.0383306981 milliliters per fortnight = 1 centiliter per decades.
centiliter per decades = milliliters per fortnight × 26.08875
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Fortnight to Centiliter per Decades.
Understanding the Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliters per fortnight are in 1 centiliter per decades?
1 centiliter per decades equals 0.0383306981 milliliters per fortnight, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per decades to milliliter per fortnight?
Multiply the centiliter per decades value by 0.0383306981. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per fortnight back to centiliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per fortnight equals 26.08875 centiliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per decades?
Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per fortnight?
Milliliter per Fortnight (mL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per decades to milliliter per fortnight conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per decades and milliliter per fortnight are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.0383306981 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.