Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — cL/decade to mL/s
Convert Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per decades = 3.168874e-8 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Decades to Milliliter per Seconds
Centiliter per Decades and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = centiliter per decades × 3.168874e-8
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per decades equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per decades-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 3.168874e-8.
Simple example
1 cL/decade × 3.168874e-8 = 3.168874e-8 mL/s
1 centiliter per decades = 3.168874e-8 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/decade × 3.168874e-8 = 0.0000019013 mL/s
60 centiliter per decades = 0.0000019013 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/decade | 3.168874e-9 mL/s |
| 1 cL/decade | 3.168874e-8 mL/s |
| 10 cL/decade | 3.168874e-7 mL/s |
| 60 cL/decade | 0.0000019013 mL/s |
| 100 cL/decade | 0.0000031689 mL/s |
| 1,000 cL/decade | 0.0000316887 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Decades
3.168874e-8 mL/s × 31556952 = 1.000000047 cL/decade
3.168874e-8 milliliter per seconds = 1.000000047 centiliter per decades.
centiliter per decades = milliliter per seconds × 31556952
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Decades.
Understanding the Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 centiliter per decades?
1 centiliter per decades equals 3.168874e-8 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per decades to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per decades value by 3.168874e-8. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to centiliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 31,556,952 centiliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per decades?
Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per decades to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per decades and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 3.168874e-8 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.