Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Decades to Imperial quart per Hours Converter — cL/decade to imp qt/h
Convert Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) to Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per decades = 1.003759e-7 imperial quart per hours). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Decades to Imperial quart per Hours converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 3.15700694e-7.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Decades to Imperial quart per Hours
Centiliter per Decades and Imperial quart per Hours both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
imperial quart per hours = centiliter per decades × 1.003759e-7
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per decades equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 imperial quart per hours equals 3.157007e-7 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per decades-to-imperial quart per hours factor of 1.003759e-7.
Simple example
1 cL/decade × 1.003759e-7 = 1.003759e-7 imp qt/h
1 centiliter per decades = 1.003759e-7 imperial quart per hours.
Real-world example
60 cL/decade × 1.003759e-7 = 0.0000060226 imp qt/h
60 centiliter per decades = 0.0000060226 imperial quart per hours.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) | Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/decade | 1.003759e-8 imp qt/h |
| 1 cL/decade | 1.003759e-7 imp qt/h |
| 10 cL/decade | 0.0000010038 imp qt/h |
| 60 cL/decade | 0.0000060226 imp qt/h |
| 100 cL/decade | 0.0000100376 imp qt/h |
| 1,000 cL/decade | 0.0001003759 imp qt/h |
Reverse conversion: Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Decades
1.003759e-7 imp qt/h × 9962551.661 = 1.000000089 cL/decade
1.003759e-7 imperial quart per hours = 1.000000089 centiliter per decades.
centiliter per decades = imperial quart per hours × 9962551.66095
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Imperial quart per Hours to Centiliter per Decades.
Understanding the Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many imperial quart per hours are in 1 centiliter per decades?
1 centiliter per decades equals 1.003759e-7 imperial quart per hours, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per decades to imperial quart per hours?
Multiply the centiliter per decades value by 1.003759e-7. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert imperial quart per hours back to centiliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 imperial quart per hours equals 9,962,551.661 centiliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per decades?
Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a imperial quart per hours?
Imperial quart per Hours (imp qt/h) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per decades to imperial quart per hours conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per decades and imperial quart per hours are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 1.003759e-7 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.