Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliter per Decades to Metric teaspoon per Decades Converter — cL/decade to metric tsp/decade
Convert Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) to Metric teaspoon per Decades (metric tsp/decade) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per decades = 2 metric teaspoon per decades). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliter per Decades to Metric teaspoon per Decades converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 3.16887385e-14 / 1.58443693e-14.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliter per Decades to Metric teaspoon per Decades
Centiliter per Decades and Metric teaspoon per Decades both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
metric teaspoon per decades = centiliter per decades × 2
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per decades equals 3.168874e-14 base units, and 1 metric teaspoon per decades equals 1.584437e-14 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per decades-to-metric teaspoon per decades factor of 2.
Simple example
1 cL/decade × 2 = 2 metric tsp/decade
1 centiliter per decades = 2 metric teaspoon per decades.
Real-world example
60 cL/decade × 2 = 120 metric tsp/decade
60 centiliter per decades = 120 metric teaspoon per decades.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) | Metric teaspoon per Decades (metric tsp/decade) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/decade | 0.2 metric tsp/decade |
| 1 cL/decade | 2 metric tsp/decade |
| 10 cL/decade | 20 metric tsp/decade |
| 60 cL/decade | 120 metric tsp/decade |
| 100 cL/decade | 200 metric tsp/decade |
| 1,000 cL/decade | 2,000 metric tsp/decade |
Reverse conversion: Metric teaspoon per Decades to Centiliter per Decades
2 metric tsp/decade × 0.5 = 1 cL/decade
2 metric teaspoon per decades = 1 centiliter per decades.
centiliter per decades = metric teaspoon per decades × 0.5
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Metric teaspoon per Decades to Centiliter per Decades.
Understanding the Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Metric teaspoon per Decades (metric tsp/decade)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many metric teaspoon per decades are in 1 centiliter per decades?
1 centiliter per decades equals 2 metric teaspoon per decades, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per decades to metric teaspoon per decades?
Multiply the centiliter per decades value by 2. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert metric teaspoon per decades back to centiliter per decades?
Use the reverse factor: 1 metric teaspoon per decades equals 0.5 centiliter per decades. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per decades?
Centiliter per Decades (cL/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a metric teaspoon per decades?
Metric teaspoon per Decades (metric tsp/decade) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per decades to metric teaspoon per decades conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per decades and metric teaspoon per decades are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.