Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Bushels per Millisecond Converter — cL/fn to bu/ms
Convert Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) to Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per fortnight = 2.346031e-13 bushel per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Bushels per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 35.23907017.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Fortnight to Bushels per Millisecond
Centiliter per Fortnight and Bushel per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
bushels per millisecond = centiliters per fortnight × 2.346031e-13
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 bushel per millisecond equals 35.2390701669 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per fortnight-to-bushel per millisecond factor of 2.346031e-13.
Simple example
1 cL/fn × 2.346031e-13 = 2.346031e-13 bu/ms
1 centiliter per fortnight = 2.346031e-13 bushels per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/fn × 2.346031e-13 = 1.407619e-11 bu/ms
60 centiliters per fortnight = 1.407619e-11 bushels per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) | Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/fn | 2.346031e-14 bu/ms |
| 1 cL/fn | 2.346031e-13 bu/ms |
| 10 cL/fn | 2.346031e-12 bu/ms |
| 60 cL/fn | 1.407619e-11 bu/ms |
| 100 cL/fn | 2.346031e-11 bu/ms |
| 1,000 cL/fn | 2.346031e-10 bu/ms |
Reverse conversion: Bushel per Millisecond to Centiliter per Fortnight
2.346031e-13 bu/ms × 4.262518e+12 = 0.9999999196 cL/fn
2.346031e-13 bushels per millisecond = 0.9999999196 centiliters per fortnight.
centiliters per fortnight = bushels per millisecond × 4.262518e+12
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Bushel per Millisecond to Centiliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many bushels per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per fortnight?
1 centiliter per fortnight equals 2.346031e-13 bushels per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per fortnight to bushel per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per fortnight value by 2.346031e-13. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert bushel per millisecond back to centiliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 bushel per millisecond equals 4.262518e+12 centiliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per fortnight?
Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a bushel per millisecond?
Bushel per Millisecond (bu/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per fortnight to bushel per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per fortnight and bushel per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.346031e-13 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.