Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Gallons per Millisecond Converter — cL/fn to gal/ms
Convert Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) to Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per fortnight = 2.183962e-12 gallon per millisecond). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Gallons per Millisecond converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 3.785411784.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Fortnight to Gallons per Millisecond
Centiliter per Fortnight and Gallon per Millisecond both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
gallons per millisecond = centiliters per fortnight × 2.183962e-12
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 gallon per millisecond equals 3.785411784 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per fortnight-to-gallon per millisecond factor of 2.183962e-12.
Simple example
1 cL/fn × 2.183962e-12 = 2.183962e-12 gal/ms
1 centiliter per fortnight = 2.183962e-12 gallons per millisecond.
Real-world example
60 cL/fn × 2.183962e-12 = 1.310377e-10 gal/ms
60 centiliters per fortnight = 1.310377e-10 gallons per millisecond.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) | Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/fn | 2.183962e-13 gal/ms |
| 1 cL/fn | 2.183962e-12 gal/ms |
| 10 cL/fn | 2.183962e-11 gal/ms |
| 60 cL/fn | 1.310377e-10 gal/ms |
| 100 cL/fn | 2.183962e-10 gal/ms |
| 1,000 cL/fn | 2.183962e-9 gal/ms |
Reverse conversion: Gallon per Millisecond to Centiliter per Fortnight
2.183962e-12 gal/ms × 457883409400 = 0.9999999665 cL/fn
2.183962e-12 gallons per millisecond = 0.9999999665 centiliters per fortnight.
centiliters per fortnight = gallons per millisecond × 457883409393
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Gallon per Millisecond to Centiliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many gallons per millisecond are in 1 centiliter per fortnight?
1 centiliter per fortnight equals 2.183962e-12 gallons per millisecond, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per fortnight to gallon per millisecond?
Multiply the centiliter per fortnight value by 2.183962e-12. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert gallon per millisecond back to centiliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 gallon per millisecond equals 457,883,409,400 centiliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per fortnight?
Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a gallon per millisecond?
Gallon per Millisecond (gal/ms) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per fortnight to gallon per millisecond conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per fortnight and gallon per millisecond are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 2.183962e-12 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.