Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Hectoliter per Seconds Converter — cL/fn to hL/s
Convert Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) to Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-11 hectoliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Hectoliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 0.1.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Fortnight to Hectoliter per Seconds
Centiliter per Fortnight and Hectoliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
hectoliter per seconds = centiliters per fortnight × 8.267196e-11
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 0.1 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per fortnight-to-hectoliter per seconds factor of 8.267196e-11.
Simple example
1 cL/fn × 8.267196e-11 = 8.267196e-11 hL/s
1 centiliter per fortnight = 8.267196e-11 hectoliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/fn × 8.267196e-11 = 4.960317e-9 hL/s
60 centiliters per fortnight = 4.960317e-9 hectoliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) | Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/fn | 8.267196e-12 hL/s |
| 1 cL/fn | 8.267196e-11 hL/s |
| 10 cL/fn | 8.267196e-10 hL/s |
| 60 cL/fn | 4.960317e-9 hL/s |
| 100 cL/fn | 8.267196e-9 hL/s |
| 1,000 cL/fn | 8.267196e-8 hL/s |
Reverse conversion: Hectoliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Fortnight
8.267196e-11 hL/s × 12096000000 = 1.000000028 cL/fn
8.267196e-11 hectoliter per seconds = 1.000000028 centiliters per fortnight.
centiliters per fortnight = hectoliter per seconds × 12096000000
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Hectoliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many hectoliter per seconds are in 1 centiliter per fortnight?
1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-11 hectoliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per fortnight to hectoliter per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per fortnight value by 8.267196e-11. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert hectoliter per seconds back to centiliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 hectoliter per seconds equals 12,096,000,000 centiliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per fortnight?
Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a hectoliter per seconds?
Hectoliter per Seconds (hL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per fortnight to hectoliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per fortnight and hectoliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 8.267196e-11 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.