Volumetric flow rate.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds Converter — cL/fn to mL/s
Convert Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) to Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) using the exact conversion factor (1 centiliter per fortnight = 0.0000082672 milliliter per seconds). See the formula, worked examples, and conversion table.
Centiliters per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds converter
Converter
Flow Rate Converter
Convert volumetric flow rates across metric, US, imperial, industrial, and scientific units.
Context values
Some unit families need one extra value for a physically accurate result.
Volumetric flow rate.
Result = input x 8.26719577e-12 / 1e-6.
Flow rate uses cubic meters per second as the base unit.
Reserved above the conversion cards and below the converter.
About Converting Centiliters per Fortnight to Milliliter per Seconds
Centiliter per Fortnight and Milliliter per Seconds both measure volumetric flow rate — how much volume passes a point over time — used to size pipes and pumps, monitor river or stream discharge, control industrial processes, and set medical infusion rates. Both are volumetric flow rate units.
Formula
milliliter per seconds = centiliters per fortnight × 0.0000082671957672
This factor comes from each unit's defined relationship to the category's base unit: 1 centiliter per fortnight equals 8.267196e-12 base units, and 1 milliliter per seconds equals 0.000001 base units, so dividing one by the other gives the direct centiliter per fortnight-to-milliliter per seconds factor of 0.0000082671957672.
Simple example
1 cL/fn × 0.000008267195767 = 0.0000082672 mL/s
1 centiliter per fortnight = 0.0000082672 milliliter per seconds.
Real-world example
60 cL/fn × 0.000008267195767 = 0.0004960317 mL/s
60 centiliters per fortnight = 0.0004960317 milliliter per seconds.
Conversion table
| Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) | Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) |
|---|---|
| 0.1 cL/fn | 8.267196e-7 mL/s |
| 1 cL/fn | 0.0000082672 mL/s |
| 10 cL/fn | 0.000082672 mL/s |
| 60 cL/fn | 0.0004960317 mL/s |
| 100 cL/fn | 0.0008267196 mL/s |
| 1,000 cL/fn | 0.0082671958 mL/s |
Reverse conversion: Milliliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Fortnight
0.0000082672 mL/s × 120960 = 1.000000512 cL/fn
0.0000082672 milliliter per seconds = 1.000000512 centiliters per fortnight.
centiliters per fortnight = milliliter per seconds × 120960
For a page dedicated to this direction, see Milliliter per Seconds to Centiliter per Fortnight.
Understanding the Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn)
Volumetric flow rate.
Understanding the Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s)
Volumetric flow rate.
Reserved between the cards and the FAQ so the page stays balanced.
Frequently asked questions
How many milliliter per seconds are in 1 centiliter per fortnight?
1 centiliter per fortnight equals 0.0000082672 milliliter per seconds, using the exact defined conversion factor rather than an estimate.
How do I convert centiliter per fortnight to milliliter per seconds?
Multiply the centiliter per fortnight value by 0.000008267195767. The converter above does this instantly to whatever precision you set.
How do I convert milliliter per seconds back to centiliter per fortnight?
Use the reverse factor: 1 milliliter per seconds equals 120,960 centiliters per fortnight. You can also use the swap control in the converter above to flip the direction instantly.
What is a centiliter per fortnight?
Centiliter per Fortnight (cL/fn) is a unit of flow rate.
What is a milliliter per seconds?
Milliliter per Seconds (mL/s) is a unit of flow rate.
Is the centiliter per fortnight to milliliter per seconds conversion exact?
Yes. Both centiliter per fortnight and milliliter per seconds are defined by fixed standards rather than physical artifacts, so the factor of 0.000008267195767 used above is exact to as many digits as you choose to display.
What's the difference between volumetric and mass flow rate?
Volumetric flow rate measures the volume of fluid passing a point per unit time (for example, liters per second). Mass flow rate measures the mass instead. For a fluid of constant density the two are directly proportional, but for compressible fluids like gases, mass flow is often the more meaningful quantity.